Skip to content

2011 Computer Science AP Reading

2011 June 20
by Hélène Martin

When I told my students I was going to be grading AP tests this year, they responded with “you’re leaving us for a week to sit in a room and grade all day?!”  I was getting ready to leave just as students were putting finishing touches on their incredible final projects and by then I was sure I’d made a terrible mistake.  How could flying across country to spend 8 hours a day grading possibly be anything but exhausting and mind-numbing?

Luckily, what I had heard from other teachers is true — the AP reading is an opportunity to get to know like-minded people, get new teaching ideas and learn a ton about the AP test.  It was exhausting and at times mind-numbing but it was worth it.  The week-long event brings together high school and college instructors who are so passionate about what they do and want to discuss it.  Being around them was energizing and gave me hope.  Though the days were grading-filled, we had time in the evenings to learn a lot from each other.

I graded question 3 which involved working with several objects and writing ArrayList algorithms.  Each free response has a few question leaders in charge of creating a grading rubric for it and making sure that scoring is done consistently across the dozens of teachers assigned to the question.  I was very impressed by both the question leaders and table leaders — the rubric was thorough and easy to understand and our training was robust.

Over the 7 days we were there, we graded over 22,000 exams.  Grading on that scale really emphasized the importance of a well-designed rubric that accounts for a broad range of student (non-)solutions.  In my own teaching, I’ve found APCS-style rubrics (example here) very useful in providing students with feedback they can immediately use.  It leaves all guesswork out of figuring out what went wrong and students can make sure to avoid making similar mistakes in the future.  I have no doubt that the fact that I grade both assignments and exams this way has increased student preparedness while also ensuring grading consistency.

Looking at thousands of responses to one question was eye-opening.  Most notably, I was blown away by just how many students turned in solutions that were either blank or worth no points.  I already knew this happened from reading student performance Q&A written by the chief reader every year — for example, in 2010 over a third of students got no points on the GridWorld question — but I wasn’t quite ready for just what that looks like.  My second day, I happened to have a pack of 25 in which only six or eight had any points at all and that was really demoralizing.  Many of those students left the entire test blank and several wrote long passages explaining that they didn’t know any computer science for various reasons.  Why do they take the test?  Do their schools make them?  Why do they take the class?  Does the AP designation mean more than actual learning?  Why do teachers accept this?  Do they know programming themselves?  Whatever the cause is, I don’t think it’s very healthy to have so many students with no clue.

I was also particularly struck by how difficult it seems to be for students to understand which classes contain which methods and which class they are writing methods for.  This certainly reinforced the notion that object-oriented programming is conceptually challenging and that it needs to be approached very deliberately.

Those who had been grading for years were able to put some of these kinds of thoughts in perspective and it was very interesting to hear their stories.  Connections to these wiser, more experienced instructors are invaluable and I look forward to continuing to learn from them.

Apply to be a reader.

3 Responses leave one →
  1. Anton permalink
    June 22, 2011

    I went to a very good public high school and took 7-10 AP classes/tests. Even within my one school there was a lot of variance in how well teachers prepared students for the tests. I remember AP Calc was all about the test and almost all students ended up taking it and doing well. In my AP Chem class, OTOH, my teacher dropped a huge packet on my desk 1 week before the test and told me “this is all the stuff we didn’t cover.” Needless to say, I didn’t do so hot.

    I’m guessing there are a lot of causes as to why students show up unprepared for the AP test:
    - they know they’re not prepared but are willing to give it a shot since there’s little downside (there’s no rule that says you have to report your tests to colleges, right?)
    - their parents make them do it (no downside for the parents other than $80)
    - it’s possible to ace the school’s AP class but bomb the AP test itself (my experience w/ chem)
    - they simply don’t know they’re not prepared (I took the CS GRE only to find out I didn’t know CS. This was after years of acing every CS class I took in high school and college)

    • Hélène Martin permalink*
      June 23, 2011

      I completely agree that there are many reasons a kid might show up to an AP test unprepared… but I don’t like any of them! To me, AP makes sense if it’s pushing the most motivated students to dig deeply into a subject and providing teachers with curricular frameworks they are successful within. The most motivated students would not leave tests entirely blank and teachers comfortable with the existing frameworks would address the topics relevant to their AP-designated course so I feel uncomfortable with the way AP is being used.

      In the case of your AP Chem course, for example, it’s possible that your teacher was great but didn’t agree with the approach the AP curriculum developers took. That’s great — s/he should have felt free to teach a rigorous course assessed in some other way.

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

  1. Reading the AP « And Yet It Moves

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS